SAFe Delusion

An independent, community-curated review of the evidence

Does this sound familiar?

If you are running SAFe and it is not delivering what you were promised, you have probably been told you are not implementing it well enough. The evidence points somewhere else.

It isn’t failing. This is what it does.

Across 10 organisations — a Swedish manufacturer, a French marketplace, an Australian bank, a car maker, a global consultancy, the United States Air Force — different sectors, different countries, different levels of capability, and the same shape of outcome.

When a result is that consistent across that much variation, it is a property of the system, not of the people running it.

What the evidence adds up to

No single case study or expert opinion settles anything on its own. Taken together, the guide finds that adoptions of SAFe tend to:

  1. lack fundamental elements of good Agile that are vital to achieving agility
  2. amplify some of the well-known problems and limitations of pre-Agile traditional solutions
  3. waste a lot of time and effort for learning and adopting outdated, or 2nd best practices

Read the conclusions in the guide →

10 case studies, selected for independent verifiability
74 cited sources, every claim traceable
8 Agile Manifesto signatories, alongside former SAFe Principal Contributors and the authors of the practices SAFe assembles
Before you read further

The guide’s argument is with SAFe, and not with the coaches and trainers who teach it — many of whom it describes as capable, respected professionals. Scaled Agile Inc. is invited to respond, and any response is published unedited.

Where to start

Everything above is a summary

SAFe for Decision Makers

Now that Agile passed the early adopter stage, there are many companies interested in adopting it, and many practitioners interested in learning it. Yet those companies and practitioners without extensive Agile experience have a hard time evaluating what will bring them value and what not. The information collected in this document is to help them make an informed decision.

Read the guide Edition 2024.8 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Curated and contributed to by
Luca Minudel Luca Minudel Yves Hanoulle Thomas J. Owens Thomas J. Owens Chris Combe Luis Azcona Latasa Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens Martin Hinshelwood Martin Hinshelwood Ove Holmberg Steve Bement

About this site →